How to pronounce“Bohm”in English

John Bell read David Bohm's papers in 1952 when they were first published, and he immediately knew that something was wrong, not with Bohm's papers.

And then he saw Bohm's papers, worked through them, and realized, no, there's nothing wrong with this.

Can I come up with something like Bohm's version of quantum physics without having this instantaneous action at a distance?

But there was one student who was enthralled by Bohm's approach, and that was Yakir Aharonov.

The first to try was a colleague of Aharonov and Bohm's at the University of Bristol, Robert Chambers.

But then he says, OK but there's something else funny about Bohm's version of quantum physics.

People often characterize Bell's theorem not only as proving that Bohr was right, but that proving that you cannot have anything like Bohm's version of quantum physics.

- Robert Oppenheimer, who was David Bohm's PhD advisor, wanted to bring him squarely onto the new Manhattan Project efforts.

I know that they're wrong because there is nothing wrong with Bohm's version of quantum physics, and these proofs would rule it out.