How to pronounce “but” in English

And so you keep these staples in.But--

Because I'm honestly always willing to just let it out.But--But I love putting those little things into Dorothy because those were my favorite things about her.

Yes Yes. Don't start that.But--

Yes Yes. Don't start that.But--

Right, and so you're-- Right?But--

Like, we did do some Warrior Poses and those kinds of things.But.Yeah. There was like a little level of meditation that went into it and a bit of flexibility.

Easy or difficult?But--

It's probably not partying, or going to nightclubs, or something like that.But--

Yeah, I'm not a parent, because that looks really hard.But--I do run educational workshops on LGBT issues for people who work with young people or people who aren't parents or guardians or foster parents

So, yeah, I don't know, I did, I guess.But--I think one of you mentioned the machine of preparing for the Olympics.

You'd think so, because this movie looks great.But--So that, you know, amazing.

Because .But .So then after that, ,, May the 7th, 2008.

So I don't want to come in the video.But .That was a fantastic-- That's my song.

Sorry, Dad.But--So did you not hang out with any other Asian kids, then?

That was a dirty laugh.But--Unloading, come on. They do-- that's what I thought he was getting at.

If you start looking at-- looking up to such people, they are your true mentors.But--

But--

But--

But--

But

But--

But--

But--

But--

But--

But--

But --

but no wisdom. Is there room for wisdom?

But I'm afraid ...

But I have a question about it.

But humans don't develop that quickly.

But I have bad news for you.

But right now, we're not on path to doing that.

but if I dump it out on this side of the room only ...

But we've gotten a little bit away from that stuff, too.

But most physics textbooks are wrong.

- But when Newton added a third body, well, that's when everything fell apart.

But with three bodies, this is no longer the case.

But what if there was some other way to approach it, a way to simplify the math and not have to worry about these three-dimensional vectors?

But for that to work, he didn't just need the potential, he needed the potential energy and the kinetic energy too.

But to get the potential energy, we need to add in a second body.

- But if you pluck the kinetic and potential energy into the Euler-Lagrange Equation, then you can quickly get to a solution at least numerically.

But with the Lagrangian approach, you could just write down the energy, which is a scalar not a vector, plug it into the Euler-Lagrange Equation,

- But for all its usefulness, the potential wasn't enough to help Lagrange solve the three-body problem.

But there is one important difference.

But one force was much trickier to find the potential for, and that was the magnetic force.

But Thomson realized that the magnetic vector field B could be defined as the curl of some other vector field, the magnetic vector potential A.

But even Thomson thought this was a kind of device, a helpful device, and not a substitute for like the real physics.

But that raises an important question.