especially if you were to look at this with a broader perspective, like thinking about where Democratic Socialists of America have have gotten to in the last 2 years. I mean, I remember how I felt in 2024, you know,in the aftermath of the DNC about about where the American Socialist movement was as opposed to where it is now.
from a life of self-expression, such as exploration and creativity. The socialists neglected, then, to provide for innovation. The rudderlessness and the social upheaval wrought by the modern economies led, in the interwar years, the 1920s and 1930s,
"You don't know what you're doing because you're so young." And it was an opportunity at that point to get together with other young people who-- people labeled as socialists and communists and people who were not respectful of the system to really come together and look at what were some of the disparities and what were our concerns as disabled people.
Mussolini, a leading corporatist, promised higher productivity through innovation, but without arranging much for innovation. Corporatists and socialists have continued to claim, right up to the present day, that their systems boost economic performance on their measures. But data from the 1980s and 1990s do not support those claims.
Drake, yeah, the artist, Drake. I don't like socialists , so...
we think not about the Pope Pius IX, or the Mahdi, we think about socialism and communism. In 1800 there were hardly any socialists or communists, very few. Even in the middle of the 19th century, there was still a fringe group of bizarre people who have such thoughts, but there
We are undoubtedly going to be the freest country in the world. In that context, the socialists , they moved the discussion of class struggle in economics and took it to other areas.
They could do business. And it was so different from England where the Labour or socialists and the conservatives were always butting. And now you've got exactly what we had in the mid '60s and what do you do about it?
Who are the dominant forces? Maybe you could describe, and you mentioned Democratic socialists , the progressives, maybe liberals, maybe more sort of mainstream left, and the same on the right with Trump and Trumpism.
And all of a sudden there's these 18 and 19-year-olds really making the NRA sweat and really pushing people. I get emails all the time from different chapters of the Democratic Socialists of America saying, oh, we'd love to have you for an event or whatever. That tells me there's all these young people out there who are deeply committed to change and willing to fight for it,
Their main policy to deal with economic and wealth inequality was in fact broadening property ownership. It wasn't redistribution. They were obviously not socialists or communists, such things didn't exist. My second point is that US wealth inequality is in fact from the concentration of capital ownership and capital income.
and undermining the United States' government." At Harvard Business School, professors had developed the very Bayesian decision trees that MBAs use. But they were called 'Socialists ' and 'so-called scientists'. And a Swiss visitor to Berkeley's very Frequentist department, statistics department in the 1950s, realized that it was "kind of dangerous" to apply these Bayesian methods.
They wanted to defend the status quo and keep the Tsar in power. But then on the other side, you had the socialists who wanted this complete political reform. And this division was so bad that it crept into every part of society to the point where even mathematicians started picking sides.
We are undoubtedly going to be the freest country in the world. And also, we must not forget that those murderers called socialists killed 150 million people.
uh in contention, right? Yeah. I didn't realize that that I don't even think anyone else realized that this was actually an anti-semitic statement. I've only heard about it being referred to as like capitalist big dog and red alert as a common thing that uh socialists have have deployed against uh capitalist but that common thing could be based in a history that has anti-semitic ties
on a body and seeing how they would drape on a woman's body. And I shouldn't really say this online, but my parents are total socialists .
Some nations moved part of the way to a socialist economy, seeing more planning and more state ownership as a step towards stability, equality, and greater employment. Generally speaking, the socialists spoke of greater development of people's capacities to produce, but showed no consideration or awareness of the deeper goals of individuals, the non-material rewards deriving
I have seen cases of agorists. I mean, it's the anarcho capitalists who criticize Rothbard because he said that you have to get into politics, otherwise the socialists will advance? And it's interesting because some of them, I have seen them criticizing, proposing egorism.
We are undoubtedly going to be the freest country in the world. No, it was not the end of history because the following year, in 1990, the socialists gathered at the Sao Paulo Forum and based on the ideas of Gramsci,
in societies. Let's first look at society as a whole. And well, what we have seen that you should invest in good governance, democracy, and gender equality because that are the strong predictors, and not in income equality. Too bad for the Socialists and even the welfare state doesn't really add. Which is not to say that income inequality is not unfair and so, for other
On the other hand, we had drawn the opposite lesson. We socialists thought like Italian leader Berlinguer
people, of Asian Americans, of immigrants, of socialists , and anarchists, and troublemakers of all time". I've been to a number of memorial services for Howard Zinn now, and, um, uh,
Socialists of America have have gotten to in the last 2 years. I mean, I remember how I felt in 2024, you know,in the aftermath of the DNC about about where the American Socialist movement was as opposed to where it is now. Mhm. We are clearly a force to be reckoned with, and that's precisely the reason why a lot of people are paying close
The fluctuations and disparities in outcomes, and even in prospects, typical of modern economies and the endemic unemployment led to socialist opposition. Some nations moved part of the way to a socialist economy, seeing more planning and more state ownership as a step towards stability, equality, and greater employment. Generally speaking, the socialists spoke of greater development of people's capacities to produce,