How to pronounce “replication” in English

replication uh under many circumstances memes similarly are things made out of Information With

self-replication, meaning make copies of itself from loose cells that you put in its environment.

of replication.

differential replication and the words are not always

the replication of what's working.

The replication rate is 1.1%.

self-replication so the cool thing is if you want to make a rep wrap we made it big enough that all the parts for a rep

who are better at replication will, of course, now dominate from that point forward.

because cellular replication is generally highly conserved, which means it's the same in pond scum, and mammals,

this cellular replication and control telomeres.

Another idea is molecular replication, in particular, RNA molecules, because they are so important to us organisms now.

And it's a replication of a painting from 1619 called "Ships Running Aground in a Storm."

So there was this replication, which is a function of that friction that exists between minority groups who have to create something when they need

in China Escape by replication or by copying which is to say are the bits moved from inside China to out or do

just pure replication where you know I take a message and I pass it along a lot of it is you know I make a modification

it's not just replication it's remixing um but I would say that there are sort of equal and opposite troubles with

at the data and replications the Milgram experiment if you can actually see the other person that you're administering

What just happened fully spontaneously is replication.

That winning species has a replication rate of 20%, compared to the 17% average across all populations.

We're in the middle of a replication crisis.

So we see that kind of replication.

DNA is incredibly reliable in its replication, but when you've got three billion base pairs of DNA, every time your cells divide, you're duplicating that.

that life is really an information replication and management system.

So this idea that molecular replication somehow solves the problem will not do.

I love that idea of replication, right?

And Dave had a smaller replication of that painting.

Attitude they provoke their own replication and they don't have to

by using the appropriate techniques of replication.

And the result was an exact replication, which he thought was too boring to publish.

I think if we have replication in an additional data set, some of these problems will disappear.

And were chance findings that we perform replication, they go away.

I think the results and the replication profile could be different depending on who is replicating.

Just having too much wasted replication.

There's been lots of international replications.

later there have been about 20 good replications of that uh of that claim

Perhaps a stray ray of UV light hits it during the replication process, or the replicator uses a building block it wasn't supposed to.

Second, a replication rate, the chance to copy itself with each time step.

And the third kind of path is some variation on replication or franchising, that maybe it's not just one private sector company or one government,

them and keep them from injecting bad or erroneous DNA during replication.

But the idea is that you would get molecular replication.

viruses a virus travels light it doesn't carry its own replication Machinery with

out those are domesticated words you're controlling their replication not perfectly but you're

You can have weak selection and not very faithful replication of ideas and cultures.

So psychological sciences in general have a culture that replication is not really very advantageous

But many of the scientific fields have developed some replication culture, and we have more evidence on how frequently results do get replicated.

When we have empirical evidence in fields where replication practices are common, then most the time most of the initially claimed statistically significant effects

Very, very bad replication rates by several teams at Amway and Bayer and other companies.

Too many significant results is not necessarily a sign of replication.

The other question is who's going to do the replication?