How to pronounce “nietzsche” in English

both at an individual level, but also at an organizational level, constantly keep reinventing yourselves as well.Nietzsche says that when you know your why you can bear almost any how.

And you know who's going to tell you?Nietzsche. Friedrich Nietzsche is going to say-- and this is what he did say, and he argued incredibly-- I would say in an incredibly convincing way-- he would say,if you say I'm an atheist, and then you say but we should not starve the poor and we should honor their equal rights,

You have very little to lose by adding an ingredient and tasting.Nietzsche had between-- actually, even Seneca discovered it, but we attribute it to Nietzsche.

One last thought and then I'll be ready to take your questions in this.Nietzsche wrote about the age of a child.He says, "In the development of a human being, we have three ages.

money. And we'll make enough money to back and buy more espresso floats." So, we went up there--it's a true story-- and we would rap to Rousseau and Kant andNietzsche and we were just out free-styling to these philosophers. We thought it was just the most amazing; we were just flying so high at that point, like, "This is gonna be completely,this is gonna be amazing. We blow people's minds." And we had a hat out and we were making all kinds of money and then someone stole our hat with all our money. And we left and

and different people, and where things fell together, where things fell apart. So, that, like it's a very fitting analogy I think for what I'm trying to talk about in the--in theNietzsche chapter that there is the sense of like, you know, one single moment can be very interconnected. And a lot of times it's impossible for us to kind of discern like,you know, how these connections happened but it's just--like as a metaphor, I just want you to think about that image of this like string map with all of these different things.

Ubermensch or the--oh, okay. All right. Fair enough. But you can read the book and kind of like get a good, like, jumping start on that. But no, you're right about the--it'sNietzsche and the show. >> Hey, Tyler, thanks for coming.

The good life is a wild ride through an economy with an open future, an economy offering unimagined rewards, a life of Kierkegaardian mystery,Nietzschean challenge, and Bergsonian becoming.This is what we must hope to regain.

There's something down there.Frederick Nietzsche said, if you stare into the abyss long enough, it will stare back into you.It's like, there's something down there.

If the trauma or adversity involved another person who was untrustworthy that we trusted, it calls into question our ability to evaluate people and decide whoAnd Nietzsche was right, a sense of being stronger for having survived.

Even after they had their big idea, they still had to edit it and refine it and make it, you know, good enough for the real world.As Nietzsche once observed, "Creators have a vested interest in our believing in the flash of revelation, the so called inspiration shining down from the heavens as a ray ofgrace, but this is often a lie.

a lot actually. I think, you know, and it's--I'm prefacing it by saying, you know, here's what I think Nietzsche would think but, like, you know, the idea for other people who are curiousabout Nietzsche's concept of Ubermensch basically is that this is an individual who has sort of gone beyond, like, you know, like the normal standards of ethics and morality, and it sortof, like, almost like evolves into a different, like, ethical being, someone who's like, you know, is self-creating and therefore like, doesn't have to listen of what other people,

Again, it transforms an impulse into a choice.But if you read Nietzsche in the original, what he really meant by the ubermensch was someone who could master the lowest parts of himself.

Now, I can handle the horrible that's coming at me.Like Friedrich Nietzsche. Yeah.Like Friedrich Nietzsche. OK.

Like Friedrich Nietzsche. Yeah.Like Friedrich Nietzsche. OK.Batman has looked into the abyss as we all have, and-- And the abyss was afraid.

As an idea, it rivals monotheism.Just as in Nietzsche's scheme, man created science, which in turn killed god, analog culture-- that's books, clocks, film, industrial machines, the compasses and timersof scientific method. Those things created digital culture, and now digital culture has superseded them.

Americans don't always think of him as a philosopher.He really inspired Nietzsche's best work, and is a glorious figure in American intellectual history.Emerson, he goes to visit colleges-- and I'm afraid it's Harvard again-- he goes to visit Harvard.

So for those of you who aren't familiar with Existentialism, it is a psychological perspective, these days, imported from German philosophy.People like Nietzsche. And it has a lot of German words in it that bore the heck out of people.So I try to keep students awake by asking them pesky questions, and asking them to do pesky things that are designed to make them think.

want things to repeat. We don't want New York City to blow up, so Hiro travels back in time.But for Nietzsche he puts to us the question, "If we could change things to be other than they were, what does that tell us about ourselves? Why would we want to do that? Why do we wantthinks to change?" And I'm going to come back and like try to offer an explanation for the answer. But, the way when we answer this question kind of serves as, a way of providing some

philosophers high on Nietzsche and Ayn Rand who hoped only to find professors worthy of having them as a student, she had no need to travel David with their essays. Such as,

Harold: Reading Nietzsche, I hear a bird in trouble.

It goes back to Friedrich Nietzsche on the genealogy of morals.

And therefore, if you hold on to those values, you're actually being a Christian, and a very, very inconsistent person even though you won't admit it.I don't think you can answer Nietzsche.So now here is what we are.

You go back to 1884 with Nietzsche even saying, "We should call every truth false which is not accompanied by at least one laugh."

things, like these larger issues that I'm talking about. But, speaking of interest, I want to talk specifically about what I wrote in the Heroes and Philosophy volume, and thetopic was on time and meaning in Nietzsche and heroes. Time to me is such a philosophically interesting topic. I--our understanding of time on the most like fundamental levels reallydoes inform a lot of, who we are as people, as human beings. Many philosophers have argued

all of the stuff up. If you look closely in one of the episodes from season three, Arthur Petrelli who's, like he's the bad guy of the show in that season. He's actually holdinga copy of one of Nietzsche's books: "Thus Spoke Zarathustra". It's none insignificant detail, and given the stuff that cover in the chapter on Nietzsche but, the point is,the philosophy is there if we care to look for it. Usually the philosophy isn't quite as transparent as the character like actually holding the book--actually it's never that

It is the fault of the post-Nietzschean descendents.

For example, Nietzsche thought that only man would laugh, because only man can experience despair and awfulness that meant that laughter was a way of reacting to that.

I mean, Nietzsche says, never trust the idea that wasn't done in movement.

springboard in my life where I was reading people like Nietzsche and Schopenhauer and Darwin and Bertrand Russell and I realized that I'd become a doubter. I didn't have that

- so-called monsters? You referenced Nietzsche in the book, you know, "Gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes into you." If you study, quote unquote,

the other end of Christianity, Nietzsche declares God is dead.

You have very little to lose by adding an ingredient and tasting.But the first person who discovered it-- let me give you the background-- is Nietzsche.

you know, if everything would repeat over and over, and over again for all eternity.It supposed to be a thought problem and the eternal recurrence--what Nietzsche's means by this is that, everything that has happened and is happening and will happen, will happenover and over, and over, and over again. When we start to think about it in a minute, we're

Well, I mean when I think of Heroes and Nietzsche in the same, you know, area--the first thing that comes to mind for me is Nietzsche's whole philosophy of the Ubermensch. So myquestion for you would be: Which character do you think would be Nietzsche's favorite--like most characteristic of the Ubermensch, or at least his least unfavorite?Okay. >> I mean, and a few characteristics and the reasons why. >> SHORES: Okay. Yeah, I like that question

- There I go, anthropomorph- I just always love to quote Nietzsche, so there we go.

The next morning over the phone, Oliver tells me-- still concerned about the coming talk-- he decided to photocopy a few things in preparation,Descartes, Pascal, Nietzsche, only now he has 200 pages of these copies.The next night at the New York Public Library, Susan Sontag introduces Oliver as one of the best living writers in the English language.

"Years ago, it occurred to me that Darwin and Nietzsche agreed on one thing.

And we did talk a lot about that-- idealistic 19- or 21-year-olds talking about Kierkegaard and Nietzsche

grace, but this is often a lie.In reality, all great artists and thinkers are great workers." To illustrate his point Nietzsche described Beethoven's musical notebooks which documentedthe composer's pain staking process of refining his melodies.

to be awful, it's supposed to be that feeling of unmitigated, you know, lack of change and no hope of there ever being a change. So, it's a thought problem, it's kind of a downerbut that's what philosophy is sometimes. So, Nietzsche and like I want to quote one of his works directly from the Gay Science, he describes the situation in the following way."There will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought, and every sign, and everything and honorably small and great in your life will have to return

What would your life look like if it were, you know, like little push pins and strings, and like you connect people in events and times, and everything together? Like I thinkthat's a very, very appropriate way to kind of understand what Nietzsche is talking about.So that's one of the things that, in terms of philosophical questions that Heroes and Philosophy discusses. Another thing we should dealt more into that I mentioned earlier is

be an evolution from like, you know, like what--he's asking us to consider what exactly is the goodness of good and the evilness of evil. One of the things that he talks aboutwithout getting into too much more detail about this was the, Nietzsche suggest that good and evil could possibly have started from just like, you know, this means of differentiationthat good and evil without any sort of like moral evaluation would just simply be a way of saying, you know, goodness and evilness could have been a term of like, you know,

I have to talk about. And yes, if you have any questions, let me know. Thanks.Well, I mean when I think of Heroes and Nietzsche in the same, you know, area--the first thing that comes to mind for me is Nietzsche's whole philosophy of the Ubermensch. So myquestion for you would be: Which character do you think would be Nietzsche's favorite--like most characteristic of the Ubermensch, or at least his least unfavorite?

read very serious books, Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Nietzsche, historical works, Eastern classics, you name it. And they educated themselves. They liberated themselves in a certain way, I think,

the UK market, it's Making Evil, which is a reference to a Nietzsche quote, which is, "Thinking evil is making evil." The idea being that evil is a label we place onto

Is there a danger of that? I don't think so. I think that's what people fear. So, a lot of the Nietzsche quotes I use as well are... Some of them I

into a city. And then the morality was completely, it was actually what Nietzsche talks about.

Again, it transforms an impulse into a choice.If any of you are interested in philosophy like I am, there's philosophical precedent for this in Frederick Nietzsche's, the German philosophers,