How to pronounce“juries”in English

juries that the spirit of witcha is still the Spirit of St Louis it's a high high-wing single engine monoplane but it costs more and go

Female judges or juries are no difference either This is not just a matter of gender.

We see it in juries.

projects sometimes have international juries and evaluations.

the biases of juries especially in southern states and places where their discrimination is still rampant you deal with politicians and some uh District

You see this a lot with juries.

You're part of many juries-- Iran, also Europe, including the Sarajevo Film Festival.

They were not impressed-- the juries-- because at midnight, it's a happy experience.

That when black people started sitting on juries, they literally held a constitutional convention so they could change the threshold so that black people would never be able to lower the conviction

Now there are times where juries make mistakes, and innocent people get convicted.

That leads us right into talking about juries, which you've alluded before that juries are a problem.

Are our peers still capable of forming juries that can deliver justice for us?

so he testified in front of juries that the chances were vanishingly small that these women would have two children die of sudden infant death syndrome.

injuries but it has to be their juries has to be there in society generally and I think that our sense that the law can be only

approach turns out that when you ask juries to behave this way

here's the bottom line mark juries under carefully controlled circumstances asked to apply this

very many countries actually use juries in civil suits con you know conflicts between people or between people and corporations um I think it's probably

liable cases in America that white Southern juries in those days

But I'm curious about your thoughts on professional juries.

it technically you're advised in any Court in California that juries are

not well if the king is making the law and the juries are just triers of fact

“Reasonable doubt” comes up in courts of law where juries are told that they must convict somebody, say a murder, only if it’s beyond reasonable doubt that they are guilty.

Imagine the following experiment: suppose that you had two juries listening to the same evidence and the two juries are not allowed to talk to each other, they're sent off onto

Now I'm not suggesting that we should have two juries in every trial, I'm just pointing out that the phrase beyond reasonable doubt doesn't actually mean what it says.

the best system I have seen and even though the juries may not be very sophisticated in mathematics chemistry physics or medicine they understand the

They had already discriminated against some, so juries weren't the best way to do it.

And it's difficult to-- first of all, juries, by and large, are not sequestered, like in the old days, where if it was a serious homicide case,

The problem with the system of civil justice in this country isn't that juries are so stupid or whatever.

negligence in uh in in in Tor law right you know driving um juries every day

the CSI effect is the policy of excluding people who watch CSI from juries because people who have a reasonable model of what forensic uh

aircraft things primarily uh with felt tip pens on easel boards in front of juries and when I was getting large verdicts against the industry all of a

communicating with Scientists on that level to me is very similar to communicating with juries personally I don't have a lot of trouble with it I I

communicating with Scientists on that level to me is very similar to communicating with juries personally I don't have a lot of trouble with it I've

defendants even in the ways that probably public defenders and certainly prosecutors and juries do and parole boards so the role of intentional

But when it's criminal case of course, juries are going to understandably the burden of proof is higher and they're going to be

More importantly, the same defendants are perceived by juries who again have listened to them lie and steal for God knows how long, to be significantly smarter and more trustworthy.

And he was like, well, I run grand juries.

called jury nullification which goes back to the time of the Magna Carta you remember the the idea of juries in the

uh what do you hate what do you dislike in a way you can find those things out from juries and you can make a at least a selection process and again you get to

have come to law and said Gee let's look at a few settings let's look at how juries behave and they apply psychological insights and they can tell

tempers it can um prevent tyranny of the majority so gridlocks sometimes can be useful in a political sense juries and criminal juries we require unan

So, there was this terrific study done that was actually looking at juries.

And they found, these researchers, that juries that were more do diverse, they were more deliberate.

So it does bring up another interesting thing that I would like to talk, about which is judges and juries.

And it occurred to me that in courts of law, for example, juries value eyewitness testimony

From the ground up I've been in-in many courtrooms talking with juries about why in a civil and-and just society, there

for example, and I suspect that this accurately portrays something like what goes on real courtrooms, and I’ve certainly been on three juries myself, there is a note of suspense

separate jury rooms and they come up with their own separate verdicts, who would bet on the juries coming back with the same verdict every single time?

Let's look at how juries behave and they apply psychological insights and they can tell