How to pronounce“geoengineering”in English

geoengineering is reallyintriguing and I like a lot of the ideas that you presented.

geoengineering because we want to know whether it works but absolutely geoengineering is something we should take into account for instance uh Marine

geoengineering in principle Marine Cloud whitening is a very feasible project it would take about 2,000 ships unmanned to go around mostly in the South Pacific

of geoengineering--there's many ideas out there that I just, I mean, I can talk to one, I guess scientist might be too generous of a word, but a researcher who wanted to change

connected to geoengineering and bioengineering,

things like geoengineering uh with things like radically redesigned agriculture uh radically redesigned

is green and I fear that geoengineering may well be necessary.

And then as people start looking at geoengineering the realization is that it is shockingly cheap.

in any possible need to use geoengineering to buy some time, frankly, because of major essentially

Basically all of them get flipped when it comes to geoengineering.

Human modification, geoengineering.

that it's important to first make clear what geoengineering is, since most people have never heard of it. And geoengineering is--I would argue-- going to be something, it's

And geoengineering is one thing that we might do that could help mitigate some of the risk to the rest of us. But it's clear that if we do any kind of geoengineering,

of people talk about when they talk about geoengineering technological hubris. And I think the degree that this discussion about geoengineering

these risks that everybody sees to pursue some sort of geoengineering?

bullet, some act of geoengineering, right?

of the planet at planetary scale with things like geoengineering uh with things like radically redesigned

taking hold of the planet at planetary scale with things like geoengineering uh with things like radically redesigned

So they are engaging in this sort of a blending of environmentalism and geoengineering and slowly raising that.

Now that's what I would say is a pretty apt analogy to geoengineering.

Your question is particularly pertinent to solutions that are on the table and have been proposed that are broadly called geoengineering, in which we try to compensate for carbon

today a particularly compelling story, in this case, on geoengineering and its effects and its potential solutions for the global warming issues.

it, he discusses the state-of-the-art and the emerging technologies on the geoengineering front and its potential for a long term climate solution.

And geoengineering, I think, is most simply defined as large-scale intervention with the climate system in order to offset,

And the other category of geoengineering is technologies that can suck CO2 out of the atmosphere directly.

this thing called, I started hearing about this idea of geoengineering.

But one of the things that interesting about geoengineering, I think, is that I came to the conclusion that it doesn't have to be

And just to have a conversation about geoengineering, you have to talk about, "OK, what kind of planet do we want to live on?"

And you can't talk about geoengineering without acknowledging that.

you know, do we have to eventually look to geoengineering?

When you look at something like the what techno fix, quick fix, like geoengineering.

Now, first of all, I mean one good way, frankly of describing what geoengineering actually is, is it's basically chemotherapy for the planet.

And not moved on in sort of worrying about GMOs, but moved on and basically are now thinking about geoengineering.

But as you can see, there's lots and lots of other opportunities, geoengineering, adaptation, carbon taxes, lots of other things, deal with methane,

I want to talk about this book, "How to Cool the Planet", and this idea of geoengineering.

So, the question becomes-- so in a certain way, geoengineering is a technical fix for

Welcome to the world of geoengineering.

And David is a really brilliant guy, who's been thinking about geoengineering

And basically, made this argument to me that if, that geoengineering can be a kind of conservation tool; that if

you really care about, say, the Arctic ecosystem, given the kind of front loading of heat and warming that we already have, exploring geoengineering is basically the, one of the only ways we

And so, if you wanna think about how to, how might we preserve that, then you have to start thinking about geoengineering.

And to me, that is the best thing about this geoengineering debate, which I've gotten a lot of heat about from

And so, one of the big fears is that this, we will not do any research on geoengineering. We'll not do any serious thinking about geoengineering

And one of the big fears that a lot of people, serious scientists who look at geoengineering, I think is that if push comes to shove and we do have to take action,

It's, as I said, there's two kinds of geoengineering in the beginning; the sunlight blocking and carbon sort of sucking part of it.

And same, this is not geoengineering scale;

And if I may go on, 'cause since you mentioned, I think you had two questions in there, you threw in the word geoengineering.

The reluctant part is, I think we've got to go to third stage and we've got to start a serious program of geoengineering.

If you highlight that the solutions to climate change are not quote, Democratic solutions like taxes and regulation, but Republican solutions like geoengineering and