The reader 's expecting a signature for a high value retail transaction.
The reader then forwards this onto the bank, along with the raw transaction details and the random number.
the reader , but the person or the community you are writing about.
the reader , but the person or the community you are writing about.
the reader that they--
The reader is there to see what the writer is going to do about it.
--the reader , that person who's done in an outline, that person doesn't exist.
the reader in that way and have it Point more towards love like I
The hard part is what you need to do to that data to trick the phone and the reader into authorizing the transaction.
The card sends this to the reader , which the reader forwards onto the bank, along with the raw transaction details.
The card sends this signature back to the reader along with the public key, which the reader then uses to verify that the signature came from that specific card
The chip then uses its secret key to garble the message into a unique code, which it sends back to the reader .
"Masala Lab" itself explores the science of Indian cooking with the aim of making the reader a better cook
The book unpacks secrets that were hidden for decades, and it takes the reader into the drama of one of humanity's greatest adventures.
The book is designed, I guess, to give room-- to provide room for the reader 's fears.
the conversation that happens inside the reader is a very profound intimacy, and it's a unique thing to literature that it
the same way that they're trying to make you, the reader , care about that character, then you don't know-- that doesn't tell you that character is not
The writer sees something in the world, the reader has not yet noticed it.
The writer positions the reader so that the reader can see it with her own eyes.
The writer and reader are equals, just that the writer knows something that the reader has not yet noticed.
The goal is to help the reader see an objective reality, and the style is conversation.
The abstruse concept of an equation breaking down can be appreciated by the reader either by pulling out a calculator and dividing one by zero,
The later material is the focus or focal point of the sentence, and it's what the reader should now notice.
The passive is the better construction when the done-to is currently the focus of the reader 's mental gaze.
The traditional solution is to always keep in mind the reader over your shoulder.
"The New York Times" described it as overwhelming and appealing, also noting that this book treats the reader as a grown-up.
In other words, I knew all the things, but what I had to keep track of was when the reader knew
The question is, is it important to present this thing on stage to dramatize it and have the reader actually go through it, or is it sufficient that we just hear about it, hear
the news we put in all the News That's fit to print what the reader is paying
the the writer and I think probably for the reader as well and so you have to give up the stuff that you get really
To the reader , my phone looks just like Marques's.
are the things that I want the reader to know by reading this book?
And the idea here is-- so I take the reader through stages of understanding.
So the reader gives the poem meaning.
--and the reader .
And the only way to make it dynamic is to make the reader believe that I believed in God at that time, that I believed in my family,
And the more details I can find to make believable, then the better that the reader will believe the unbelievable, which
So I create fictional characters that move in a real world, and that makes it more believable for the reader .
And the problem is that the short story demands something of the reader , that the reader has to respond and invest
So the story is not something that the writer writes and the reader sees, end of story.
On the other hand, there is a little bit of the possibility of either disappointing the reader because they expect it to be all about Bitcoin or of misleading
that the reader can go to get as much information as he wants.
to the reader , which we didn't want to do.
So the reader instantly becomes a translator for Groot, which is pretty cool.
teaches the reader how to embrace these turns and changes.
to the reader . And the great thing about it is that neither the author nor the reader can predict when it's going to happen
So the whole book is an effort to bring the reader to the point where you can say, ah, that's what we're arguing about.
let the reader determine what they think of it.
to the reader before others, and thus affects how the information is absorbed into the reader 's mind.
In the ones for writers though, you have one that says, it is a sin to waste the reader 's time.