Scanning thousands of native English clips with synchronized subtitles and exact timestamps.
Listen to native speakers pronounce “redistribution” in real conversational contexts with synchronized timestamps and subtitles.
jobs for people on farms that paid all that much.redistribution payments to allow them to have a standard of living that lets them lift themselves up?
redistribution payments to allow them to have a standard of living that lets them lift themselves up?
for redistribution to invest in health, education, infrastructure, all the things that governments have to invest in.
It's coming through redistribution.
And that redistribution is upwards, and it's vastly asymmetrical.
No amount of redistribution.
It wasn't redistribution.
Without doing redistribution. Well, the policies we talk about in the book don't involve redistribution, they
And this is where redistribution markets come in.
They also sell redistribution rights and the rights elsewhere.
and initiates a land redistribution program.
Rich countries already engage in lots of redistribution.
believes in high levels of redistribution but believes in borders at the same time.
So it's not just about redistribution of a fixed pie.
So Germany had pretty much resources for redistribution, for enhancing welfare state of giving people health care,
There has never been any redistribution.
And to think about that distribution and redistribution of resources and how vital that is, and that those processes have developed over all time,
So she completely grasped the idea of redistribution and why she thought it was important.
And he didn't mean redistribution-- taking your property and giving it to me-- what he meant was opportunities to acquire property
Than a government that might engage in redistribution.
And so I think when we're doing all this redistribution, we have to be seriously asking these questions, are we getting more prosperity for everybody out of it or not?
policies like a higher minimum wage or some sort of redistribution, people are much more willing to accept it.
going to create a more equal society um through redistribution, basically.
A lot of Americans don't really like the idea of redistribution, even if they'd be the beneficiaries of redistribution.
And I think the stark choice that we have is between redistribution, broad-based property ownership attempts that we're talking about, and feudalism.
to maintain broad-based property ownership there will be calls through redistribution in a democratic system, the majority that will be disenfranchised will vote for higher taxes.
detested programs he thought would result in too much redistribution of wealth.
Robert Reich: Well this country doesn't like direct redistribution, we never have.
they've promised that they're going to deal with land redistribution and hit I think a 40% target by elections in
But once you go above that, so much redistribution occurring also with massive disincentives for individuals to work.
An interesting question that I want to look at is, suppose we kept the US redistribution programs in place as they are now.
reconstruction has a focus on equality, and it tries to achieve equality in large part through redistribution.
higher than these basic needs, some level of free redistribution, some level of redistribution is absolutely necessary.
And as a result of that, there was also believed that any sort of redistribution was essentially meaningless, because it would only translate
And so there's this kind of utilitarian, but market-oriented reason to do redistribution, to care about intergenerational wealth transfer.
And so in a democracy, where we're not voting for more redistribution, do think there's partly a behavioral economics explanation for why there's that seeming mismatch,
He said without violating the laws of property, in other words without redistribution, reduce extreme wealth towards mediocrity-- he means the middle class-- and raise extreme indigence
There really is no other alternative, other than a redistribution or broadening property ownership.
And that would be the closest we could possibly get if we ever got there to a quote redistribution although don't use that word.
male #7: Yeah in terms of fixing the structural problems you brought up rather than just establishing redistribution, would you say that education is the key to expanding the top as opposed
Maybe in the bottom decile we're doing things where people's economic outcomes could, you know, perhaps better given the redistribution that we have.
You can't have a progressive agenda, whether it's the Democrats or the Labor Party or whatever party in the world, just about redistribution.
You need a narrative-- literally politically in terms of the platforms-- about the creation of wealth, not just the redistribution of wealth.
It's sort of dismantling and restructuring of the traditional family unit, a redistribution of rules
Moreover, this became accepted by economics departments who then thought, well, redistribution is not our department.
As to his solution, yes, his solution would be called a redistribution because what he would like to do is have high income tax taxes
We're putting it up with an open, what has now become known as Creative Commons license, which allows for the legal reuse, redistribution, copying, basically do what you want, with
So the first is called redistribution markets. So, to tell you the power of redistribution
Redistribution markets also