But that means reforming, tuning up, changing that political system because the the problems in that political system help to explain all of the economic problems that I think so many Americans areliving with, where you've had enormous economic growth and shockingly little of it making it into people's pockets.
And they're they're they're not all the same. They have different views. So there's a tech authoritarian group who want influence over the American political system because it's good for their businesses and because they don't get the point of democracy anyway and they think they should be in charge.There's a a kind of Christian nationalist group who think the United States should not be a secular state. It should be a Christian state and they
happening. But some of this is nothing to do with Trump. You know, we are now living in a world where the historical political system , um, the one that was built after 1945, some people call it the liberal world order, I don't really like that term because it sounds kind ofmushy, but the the order that has existed since 1945, the one that was somewhat based on the UN, that was based
alongside a culture of narcissism. And as a result of all that, we had a political system that was becoming almost suicidally stupid.So, nearly a decade later, I thought, "You know what? I'm going to bring him back onto the show to revisit the book
guards do not constitute a monolith, but for argument purposes, I think if there is one center of gravity in the political system , it's the IRGC. And they are, you know, running the place in the name of the new supreme leader,who's not been heard or seen up, you know, until now, or, you know, thus far.
On this side of the Atlantic, in Britain, the Methodists were always in a bit of difficulty about how they dealt with an established church -- whether they were on the inside of the political system , whether they were outside. And in America, they were just another faith competing against others. And that brings me to the second document,which I think explains an enormous amount, which is Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations.” People forget that there is part of that which deals with this.
So, you think the United States is going to put ground troops in, Iran are going to resist, and then chaos is going to break out in the United unusual political system in that it's a theocracy. It's a religious government,
There's a lot of identity politics that exist in the Middle East that are different than what we have in America. Our political system here is very different than the political system in the Middle East. And so what you have, you don't have separation of church and state.
with regards to freedom of information, freedom of expression. Their political system is more free than it is in China. And in this case--
The pretax has increased for a number of reasons; a lot of them are related to how we structure our corporations. Our political system , complacency, lack of awareness and the last factor I want to mention is just the reality of our system has worked very well for some groups.
television, which I listen to like everybody else, but can you even tell what people are saying anymore? They're so busy yelling at each other; nobody stops to listen. And in a political system , like the United States, where the founding fathers separated power between the branches of government, you need time. You need time for people not to have to go to their corners and have a mic shoved in front of their faces the minute a problem comes up. They commit to a particular solution and now they're stuck. And if they move toward
Observer on that front I think we at Google and and all folks who are interested in the the evolution of the American political system welcome his engaging in that battle and and while an introduction should be about the introduc C and not the introduc or I should note that it's my birthday today and I can't imagine more enjoyable way to spend it than introducing and
think prise not to tell anybody what I'm going to tell you now but but part part of it is because as I understand the way our political system works you really do as as Speaker have to get everybody on the same page establish the facts and you have the power of Investigations and and bringing light to sort of move
And so he thought it would be take out the Supreme Leader, then they'll negotiate. We'll get a better deal. We'll have a political system there or political leader there that is obedient to us. Yep. It'll be and it'll be maybe it won't be a day, but it's not going to be a month.
talking about the protection of democracy rather than kind of acknowledging some of the shortcomings with our political system and vowing to improve it. I want to kind of put you in that hot seat. If you could pass a law or wave a magic wand that you think would make our democracy more fair, what would it be?
And so this new environment that India finds itself in, in which capital is much easier to get than it was before, or at least has been, but the political system is much more difficult. What it means is the old system that India was using to build steel mills and mines and toll roads is now broken. But there isn't a new system.
and a political system that was completely irrelevant from his daily life on the roads.
of our political system .
of a political system .
So the political system needs to be responsive to what people actually want.
in that political system would have been thought impossible a few short years before that can also affect change here.
into the political system .
It was the whole political system that was shaking.
And now the political system is more democratic.
is that our political system is over here, very much bounded by moneyed interests.
But we see political parties or the political system becoming more technocrat, and more to your point, the story with Tony, about being effectively fed what was to be
The pretax has increased for a number of reasons; a lot of them are related to how we structure our corporations. But also in our political system .
That the way our political system works is shaped by the rules and regulations.
And our political system is distorted so the question, and it works for the one percent, the question is how are we gonna reform the politics?
to push/nudge the political system into rethinking its priorities, investing in the next generation
harder in that political system to get there. So you can say that.
So it's the difference of political system .
why Neville Chamberlain and the British political system arrived at the policy of appeasement.
I'm really worried about where we're headed as a country. I think many ways our our entire existence has been about creating a different kind of political system and introducing it to the world. That's what we're about. And now that whole project is in question. That whole project is In my view, it's on the
Venezuela. We see it with Greenland. We see it with Iran. I mean, if there was that level of uncertainty in a smaller political system , and that happens all the time, we wouldn't care as much because the global impact would not matter. But everyone out there is affected by even small changes in the United States. Suddenly, big changes in the United States. The Americans are
And that has gripped our political system , and it's worked its way down through the way people talk about this stuff.
And they helped me work the political system .
But another feature of the Chinese political system is that any elite leader is expected
So one feature of the Chinese political system is if you anoint a successor, you actually are creating a rival, and you're creating a new base of power.
There is a narrative in the Chinese political system that China was once a great nation.
of one-party or authoritarian political system .
has no place in the legal or political system where they can protest, even at a later date.
The problem is we have a political system that does not work with polarization.
It was actually a pretty complex political system .
But how do we change the political system to promote better outcomes in the economy
of cultural finance operating in our political system so that any government intervention for any reason has to be justified in the context of an ideology that is deeply antithetical
the marginal vote that will determine the political outcomes. If we do these things, then we could have probably change India's political system from the 19th-century archaic
My concern is there's a political system that would immediately spring to force to try to counter anything. How do we finesse the politics to get the
That the people should have the power in a political system , not kings,
It's concerned to some degree with what makes a good political system .