How to pronounce “particles” in English

And I leave it there. Well, since it has no mass, it doesn't feel gravity. It's still floating there. And that is really all the Higgs field is. Someparticles have effectively what you could call the Higgs charge that interacts and sees the field, and other particles don't. And and that is really what you read justbasically means. Now, it's kinda neat because in the ordinary day, there is a Higgs field right there, and the Higgs field is

- So the fusion reaction itself is still fundamentally an atomic reaction. And so during this reaction, you do create ionizing radiation. You create X-rays, you create neutrons, and you create all these chargedparticles. The charged particles themselves for a fusion reaction are all contained in the- the fusion system. And the X-rays, similar to think about a dentist office,although a lot more than that, but that type of same X-ray and X-ray energy is absorbed by the fusion system. But the thing we do care about is those

variety of means, physical means, those particles. You push them together. The most common is called laser inertial fusion.particles to this solenoid. Here's the challenge. Those particles, as they're sitting in that magnetic field in this nice magnet, escape. They leave out the ends, 'cause there's nothing holding them in.

Electrons in orbit around a nucleus that has neutrons and protons and neutrons and protons. They even have smallerparticles, particles called quarks. The question is, is that the end of the story? Is it electrons and quirs andyou're done? everything is made up of them. Or might there be a finer level of structure inside the electron, inside

The energy of that big bang ultimately transmuted into particles. Thoseparticles were wafting through space.Gravity caused collections of those particles to clump together. Some of them clumped together into stars like

That's it. Period. Nope. We've seen pimezones. We've seen lambda particles, omega particles, hundreds of subatomicparticles. Why do we build atom smashers outside Chicago, outside Geneva? hugegigantic atom smashers smashing atoms apart. Why? Because then from the debris

We're hearing more and more about the this kind of space junk that is incredibly damaging, even tiny littleparticles. Should we be concerned about having something this size land back onEarth? Something this size is not going to be launched that frequently for a while,

impossible to distinguish between matter and a human being. This object is about 100mm in diameter, but it's made up of about 100 bean-sizedparticles, and when you have tactile feedback, you realize, "Ah, this is a physical object." It gives you a sharp, tactile sensation. But when thedistinction between matter and images becomes blurred, we

because they don't have too much friction, or interactions that are not happening at speeds that are highly dissimilar between these twoparticles. So they're minimizing the rate at which they dissipate energy.And in that state in which they minimize the rate at which they dissipate energy, order starts to emerge for free.

So the first one is particles.Particles seem pretty fundamental.If you ask, what is all the stuff in the universe made of, particles is the obvious answer.

And that's what Hawking discovered that's so important.Particles are not ultimately real.They're a product of your reference frame.

And so it's a crazy star.Particles became drops. Our planet, the Earth, became our home world.

So in this case, we might imagine Maxwell's demon takes the high-energy particles and tries to sort them to the left side of the partition and the low-energyparticles into the right.

But Jobs realized, you know what, it's not enough to just put people in the same building, we need to force them to mix and mingle.particles. You can model urban dwellers as particles.

started working on a very, very strange theory, which is aboutparticles. And we have a company, a foundation called theTeralia Foundation, so that the El Bulli Foundation can be a world reference in terms of sustainability.

granularity of choice is dictated by the granular of the medium by the wax or the the iron filings the the the ironparticles on the tape right but when you're picking yourcolor in Adobe Color Picker right it's either going to be you know your blue is

Now let's imagine that he stays, you know, contagious for a week or so, right? Now over the course of that week he is depositing all those virusparticles on those plates, mantle piece, ornaments. Also don't think for a second that Santa doesn't use our bathrooms, right? He drinks 4 milliongallons of milk; he's gonna use your bathroom, right? He may use a lot of our bathrooms.

particles and they can get actually get into your lungs and your bloodstream much easier because of the smallness of

particles are bons they can stack on top of each other as much as you like that is also good news because it means that

particles called photons photons carry light so the interplay of these two kinds of particles matter particles that

particles which makes up everything that you've seen in your daily life everything that you can directly detect

The particles remained airborne for days and thousands of people unknowingly breathed them in.

- Now, let's consider the local hidden variable alternative theory.The particles here are on a mission, their aim to make you believe that they're acting according to quantum mechanics when really they're acting locally.Now we are anthropomorphizing, but I think it is really useful to just imagine them this way.

For particles that aren't free, like electrons in atoms, you need to factor in potential energy, too, which gives you the full Schrodinger equation.

Because particles and their antiparticles are equal and opposite, when they come together, they annihilate and produce two photons with energy equivalent to their mass and kinetic energy.

The different vibrations of the strings in string theory, they don't produce different musical tones. They producedifferent particles. So a string vibrating one way, electron. A string vibrating another way, a cork. So matterat its most fundamental level, if you were to take a powerful microscope and look deeply inside of any piece of

these particles of light, were trapped inside, so we couldn't see anything that was happening.

sulfate particles into the atmosphere, and basically mimic what happens in a volcanic eruption when a volcano goes up and chucks out

The particles are what happens when the field interacts with you.

The particles we know the most about are sulfuric acid aerosols, but there's a bunch of ideas for other aerosols that could have different properties, better

moving particles go in the other direction.

light particles or is it waves.

and particles from industry and these kind of things.

Some particles don't. It's just a different kind of charge.

the particles and forces of which you and I are made.

The particles are remaining connected without a connector.

So you see what's happening here.The particles are not invariant.And that's what Hawking discovered that's so important.

That particles are made of little bits, right?

dust particles or to big extent, skin fragments that do contain a lot of DNA.

So in this case, we might imagine Maxwell's demon takes the high-energy particles and tries to sort them to the left side of the partition and the low-energyvarious particles. And besides ordinary electrical charge, there are various weak charges that are associated, as well.

plutonium particles onward but yet there was so much else to do in terms of

Also note that particles that have no net spin will not respond to an external magnetic field.

They act like particles. No, they don't exactly.

This is what we mean by entanglement.The two particles states depend on each other.But how do we measure the particles and force them to do one thing?

You can think of it like this.Each of the particles is gonna be asked one of three possible questions, and they need to decide on their answer while they're stilltogether so that they can coordinate on their strategy.

Whenever they happen to be asked different questions, their answer needs to disagree about 25% of the time.When our scheming local particles are interrogated, their answers for different questions match just a little too often.

Whenever they happen to be asked different questions, their answer needs to disagree about 25% of the time.Then the entangled particles go off on separate arms of the experiment.

Whenever they happen to be asked different questions, their answer needs to disagree about 25% of the time.- If these particles really are acting non-locally, this should cause paradoxes, shouldn't it?

But for particles moving at relativistic speeds close to the speed of light, that equation isn't the right one.