Cruel. Einstein himself loved good philosophers. Kant , at one point, had an image of space-time diagrams, which is really good in the 1770s.Hume's notions about causality and just looking at what you observe where than trying to understand what's going on inside.
And do you know who this is? Kante. Kante. Yeah. No whiskey for that. Too easy.
Why is it that we don't see, we don't hear about these people? Kantian. I talk a lot about Kantian Universalism, it's not practical.
They think that they've got the best players and so they try and control with a lot of possession and a lot of fast passing to each other. Kante is the central point that's connecting up everybody.
Well, yeah, that chapter is specifically about Kant . Because Kant was so hardcore that he thought you couldn't lie to anyone for any reason. So because if you imagine a world where everybody can lie, well, that world completely falls apart.
And everything falls apart. So Kant literally thought you couldn't lie to anyone, including, in his own scenario, a situation in which your brother is upstairs in your house, a murderer comes to the door and says, hi, I'm here to murder your brother.
Do you know where he is? In Kant 's view, you are not allowed to say, I'm sorry, I don't know where my brother is, which seems ridiculous. There is like a little sort of escape hatch, where he says are allowed to say things that are true but don't reveal
At least personally, I don't think that you should have much on your mind in moments like that other than, how do I save my brother's life? And Kant is so unforgiving and kind of hardcore that he doesn't care about what you want. He only cares about this duty to follow these maxims.
And then that money can pay for probably free community college for everybody, maybe even free college for people. Immanuel Kant 's maxims, I mean, are very similar to the golden rule.
And until very recently, most scholars have only been interested in the kind of line of Islamic philosophy that gets received in the Medieval West. And Kant isn't responding to the last most famous philosopher.
There's no way to do it all right. Because if we use Kant 's theory, if this were the world, where anyone could do this at any time, nothing would ever get
Evolution-- humans are products of a competitive process which selects for reproductive success not well-being. As Immanuel Kant , that great Enlightenment thinker, put it, "Out of the crooked timber of humanity no truly straight thing can be built." The third theme is humanism-- that the ultimate moral purpose is to reduce the suffering and enhance the flourishing of human beings and other sentient
That's actually a view that has many antecedents in the history of philosophy, one way or another. Even Immanuel Kant and his great critique of pure reason had a section where he talked about the self or the soul as a transcendental illusion.
So that the author of a children's story might revive earlier aesthetic motifs, possibly images encountered in his own childhood, not only resonates with Kant 's insight but also recalls the connections between creativity and nostalgia. So the problem is actually not that Joyce is nostalgic.
induction, we have to challenge those. Because to paraphrase Immanuel Kant , we don't see the world as it is. We see the world as we are.
In other words, we each see the world through our own boxes, through our own lenses. And this is Immanuel Kant 's favorite cartoon-- would have been. Here's another example.
But instead what happened is after about eight to ten minutes of their vibrant discussions, I was sort of able to say, "Okay, the two-thirds of you who are defending this are arguing on behalf of Immanuel Kant 's notion of this thing that he called reciprocal retrividivism, where we ought to mete out punishments as closely as possible to the crimes or actions that were committed. And instead of the, the wincing and the etching it, it was this sense of "tell me more, tell me more".
in your book you said that multitasking was the the key skill for the 21st Cent so explain how that I said that cuz I wanted to be kantankerous cuz I'm so tired of neuroscientists testing us with little blips on a screen and saying that's multitasking what a p fighter pilot does or a chef or a new mom who's
of the bridges substructure, creating an effect that could reasonably be called sublime, and in the Kantian sense: not cozily beautiful, but touched by a metaphysical chill. The quickened water has sculpted three immense and perfect arches into the solid ice, soaring fifty or sixty feet to their apices,
Point number two is that humans imbue our lives with morality. We sort of intuitively follow Kant 's law that humans are worth of dignity and shouldn't be treated as a means to an end. And so when we see even the slightest trace of humanity, we act in a more morally careful way.
Why is it that we don't see, we don't hear about these people? And the last iteration is with Kant .
they read a lot of Kant -- and that's not true.
So for example, Plato and Aristotle got something like 15 episodes apiece. And when I get to Kant , god knows how many episodes it will take me to cover him. Actually, I'm already sort of getting night sweats wondering how I'm possibly going to adequately deal with Kant when I get to him in the podcast.
And then we get Emmanuel Kant , who it is said you could set your watch by his walks because he'd walk around the town square
The 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant describes the focus imaginarius as such.
He taught at Harvard and is emeritus there now. And it comes out of that Kantian rule-based idea. I like contractualism more, because Kantian thought, to me, is horribly impractical.
and they're often getting the ball back up here, which allows them to do very fast attacks. Or if the ball comes up from Kante, maybe Vardy doesn't get it first time but he recovers it very quickly and then he can continue to attack on goal.
always tells them is to follow Beth Kanter.
like her ugly shirt?" You discuss what a consequentialist would say about that and what a deontological ethicist would recommend. So like what would Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant say about this moral dilemma for the ages? Well, yeah, that chapter is specifically about Kant .
And people, like Kant , the philosopher would talk about this.
Indeed, Immanuel Kant , the philosopher, argued this is what's underlying proper aesthetic enjoyment.
has been yoked to childhood. In 1798, Immanuel Kant noticed of nostalgia sufferers, Hutcheon tells us, that people who did return home were usually disappointed, because in fact they did not want to return to a place but to a time, a time of youth.
And until very recently, most scholars have only been interested in the kind of line of Islamic philosophy that gets received in the Medieval West. So I'm perfectly happy to be told about Kant , but I don't want to be told about all of the other random little German figures that Kant was
world view in ethics that you get from from Kant or from Aristotle or from John Stewart
shook everybody's faith into into mathematics K Emanuel Kant himself
Today at Google we're delighted to welcome Rebecca Kantar.
So please join me in welcoming to Google Rebecca Kantar.
I see that another topic that raised some of your race were about policies and Kant historical context. All of you shared a
democracy to work. My name is Shalini Kantayya. I'm a documentary filmmaker and a TED fellow
And it comes out of that Kantian rule-based idea. I like contractualism more, because Kantian thought, to me, is horribly impractical. It's like, you can't usually push pause in your life, enter a solitary meditation zone, derive a pure maxim, act only out of duty to follow that maxim.
to the prison as well, and Annabel Kantaria, who is a locally-based crime author.
So I thought of making one I decided to go back to Tokyo or Kanto I was able to meet great people
A friend of mine, Jim Kanter, who's from Woodland Hills was going to be here today, but his wife got sick, so I had this t-shirt
And there's a lot of very odd conclusions that it leads to. And then the last one is deontological thought, most closely associated with Immanuel Kant . And he sort of thought, like, happiness or any kind of emotion is irrelevant to the concept of morality.
Right, right. You talk about contractualism, for example, in a chapter in the book. And that's really, like-- I think you basically called it like Kant lite or like a quickstart guide to deontological ethics. Yeah, contractualism is a theory created by a guy named TM Scanlon, who's still with us.
So like what would Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant say about this moral dilemma for the ages? Well, yeah, that chapter is specifically about Kant . Because Kant was so hardcore that he thought you couldn't lie to anyone for any reason.
There's no way to do it all right. It's very forgiving. It's a very forgiving philosophy in a way that someone like Kant is not.
There's no way to do it all right. And that's actually a valid and productive way to get better, versus Kant being, OK, you're doomed now.
Progress would reach its consummation in a utopia of perpetual peace of the kind hoped for by Immanuel Kant in the late 18th century-- seems
And until very recently, most scholars have only been interested in the kind of line of Islamic philosophy that gets received in the Medieval West. One is that if you do genuinely want to understand someone like Plato or Aquinas or Kant , you had better know what they were responding to.