How to pronounce “international law” in English

international law.

international law.

International law is horrible for these types of investigations, and therefore we will never investigate or arrest our way out of the cyber threat

under international law.

to international law.

that international communities should adopt a new international law on worst forms of child labor.

under international law's refugees.

enforcing international law.

that are illegal under international law.

power than international law.

We need to have international law stopping that.

That is international law.

But a lot of international lawyers were very concerned, because the U.S. was always a leader in international law in getting other countries to sign on to these treaties that were so

saying is we do have international law that addresses what nations can do to their own people.

Israeli settlements there are considered illegal under international law.

which I reiterate is illegal under international international law.

I had not taken any international law classes in law school.

And they're doing so because international law gives them, in a sense, the right to do so in order to generate what are called more sovereign rights

And I think what you see in international law is both success and failure.

The reason is a core principle in international law called the principle of necessity.

So then you get into international law and regulation.

tribunals came and that's where we got international law of war crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide, so on and so forth.

what Spain and any state under EU law and under international law

would be a severe violation of both EU and international law.

You expect Israel to comply with all its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, and the

So each individual nation state is actually quite limited according to international law in how they

very, very complicated international law pertaining to situations like Palestine, or the state of the Rohingya in Burma, Myanmar, or Syria.

Well today, neither international law nor the US Defense policy communicates red lines associated with nuclear proliferation

no prosecution whatsoever and this in in England or under international law the

uh before the rise of the modern nation state before international law before countries and Nations uh as we know them

With us, there's a phrase in international law, it's from the Law of the Sea, and also the Moon Treaty, called the "common heritage of all

Now the way that my practice works is that it's a private for-profit international law firm.

Is it international law?

Of course not, because of another interesting principle in international law, which is called the principle of proportionality.

But I do draw a distinction between terrorism and a disproportionate state reaction, which in international law is called "disproportionate reaction."

We need international law to be enforced and we also need the direct action of going down there and saving lives and protecting the

forswearing torture and essentially saying that we believe the constit ution applies to us and there's certain elements of international law that apply

It's it's it's violating international law.

when you attack the leadership, when you attack the head of state, that is protected under international law.

Without the challenges posed by civil war, I argue our conceptions of politics, authority, revolution, international law, humanitarianism,

So what we do today is we give advice and political strategy in what's called public diplomacy, which is basically PR, and international law, the legal advice on the often

And the dean of the law school at Oxford, a man called Professor Capron, a partner at a major international law firm,

Creating new military intelligence, law-enforcement capabilities, and forging new diplomatic coalitions and promoting new norms with respect to international law.

state, or the, is slaughtering its own people, you need to abridge their sovereignty, according to international law, because they haven't attacked you, it is aggressive war.

And that, quite honestly, just -- and I think the Bush Administration really, quite frankly, didn't give a damn about international law.

He says, "It sounds fantastic but we've consulted experts in international law.

Well, we need different approaches and on one hand we need the media, we need to down there, save live and protect the whales, but we also need international law being enforced.