How to pronounce “epistemic” in English

epistemic-- and a sense, which is ontological, where ontological means having to do with existence.

Epistemically, the distinction is between types of knowledge claims.

An epistemic bubble is you have information and you don't have other information, period.

But epistemic bubbles are pretty rare.

But epistemic objectivity of the theory does not preclude an epistemically objective account

What is epistemic crisis?

Opposite perceptual curiosity was epistemic curiosity.

Now what about epistemic curiosity?

In the case of epistemic curiosity, this love of knowledge, this is a pleasurable state, an anticipation of reward--

So we have epistemic objectivity and subjectivity.

That's epistemically objective. But if I say Rembrandt is the greatest painter that ever lived, well, that's a matter of opinion.

That is epistemically subject.

Science is indeed epistemically objective because we strive for claims that can be established as true or false,

You can have an epistemically objective science of consciousness, even though consciousness is ontologically subjective.

You can make epistemically objective claims about Deep Blue.

a particular phenomenon known as epistemic trespassing which exists within academia.

So we need to understand epistemic crisis is basically when there is a total breakdown in the trust and the legitimacy

So he really he showed this epistemic curiosity.

I'll just abbreviate subjectivity-- between an epistemic sense and an ontological sense.

I think that your message about our epistemic limitation is very important.

And thanks for linking it to epistemic opacity, because this idea of fragility being measurable solves the problem

about is this question of epistemic responsibility which is--it's a fancy way of saying, like, you know, do we--what responsibility do we have to know things, like to have knowledge

How would you become more epistemically humble from your particular perspective?

And the names used here are perceptual and epistemic, diversive and specific.

Processiality-- another key component of wise choice-making-- is epistemic humility, which is the ability to, like, not exercise ego in choice-making and also

are ontologically subjective admit of an account which is epistemically objective.

And when I say epistemic crisis, people, it sounds very abstract.

So psychological uncertainty, that's called epistemic uncertainty.

But that's assuming that we live in something-- that we're all living in epistemic bubbles versus echo chambers.

So let's start with the axis that goes from perceptual to epistemic.

Again, here is an example of epistemic curiosity.

They're ambiguous between a sense, which is epistemic, where epistemic means having to do with knowledge--

But I need these two, epistemic and ontological.

It relates to the question-- it relates to the point about being epistemically humble and showing humility from your particular world view,

We need to understand that we are in point in time that we are probably in the worst Epistemic crisis that we had for hundreds of years.

So it is innovators, who by waking up to a certain fundamental epistemic humility, recognizing that the way you know and the way you see, however clearly

But then it also gives you something really important for this talk today, which is called epistemic closure, meaning that the tribe is telling you

It succeeds in many ways, but it then becomes epistemically closed.

Now notice, you all know that doesn't mean it's epistemically subjective.

But epistemic trespassing is when the

So epistemic trespassing, for example, is when the astrophysics thinks they

Epistemic trespassing

So Valentine argues that epistemic trespassers are often guilty of overestimating their own transferable skills.

So is the wave function ontic, ontological or is it epistemic?

On a human level, it's usually the person that's listening the most and practicing epistemic humility, which is a term meaning, like,

I mean, it's interesting without getting into too much of the specifics of it, but this idea again of like epistemic responsibility is sort of like what responsibility

Potentially, an innovator would think that being open to data, for example, as is the innovator's mindset, is kind of an epistemically humble thing

But you already know that you can have, in some cases, an epistemically objective science of a domain that is observer-relative.

We can interpret its operations in such a way that we can make-- now, watch this terminology-- we can make epistemically objective claims of intelligence