How to pronounce “bu” in English

Bu we'd love to talk about when you grew up.

"Bu remember one thing."

Bu we had our then 16 month old daughter.

But as they had four vowels, you had to have Ab and Ba, Ib and Bi, Ub and Bu, Eb and Be.

But when I was taking group with BU, Boston University, we go maybe to one one-star, sometime one two-star, but other than that, I take them to brasserie, bistro, too.

but no wisdom. Is there room for wisdom?

But I'm afraid ...

But I have a question about it.

But humans don't develop that quickly.

But I have bad news for you.

But right now, we're not on path to doing that.

but if I dump it out on this side of the room only ...

But we've gotten a little bit away from that stuff, too.

But most physics textbooks are wrong.

- But when Newton added a third body, well, that's when everything fell apart.

But with three bodies, this is no longer the case.

But what if there was some other way to approach it, a way to simplify the math and not have to worry about these three-dimensional vectors?

But for that to work, he didn't just need the potential, he needed the potential energy and the kinetic energy too.

But to get the potential energy, we need to add in a second body.

- But if you pluck the kinetic and potential energy into the Euler-Lagrange Equation, then you can quickly get to a solution at least numerically.

But with the Lagrangian approach, you could just write down the energy, which is a scalar not a vector, plug it into the Euler-Lagrange Equation,

- But for all its usefulness, the potential wasn't enough to help Lagrange solve the three-body problem.

But there is one important difference.

But one force was much trickier to find the potential for, and that was the magnetic force.

But Thomson realized that the magnetic vector field B could be defined as the curl of some other vector field, the magnetic vector potential A.

But even Thomson thought this was a kind of device, a helpful device, and not a substitute for like the real physics.

But that raises an important question.

But the change in landscape from one point to the next remains the exact same.

But most physicists might be wrong.

But there was a problem.

But things got even worse.

But fear surrounding his communist sympathies followed him wherever he went.

But there was one student who was enthralled by Bohm's approach, and that was Yakir Aharonov.

But really what's responsible for these, you know, even phase changes were still the fields.

But you spoke to Aharonov. - Yeah.

but that information is lost when you go and swap it out for the electric field.

But importantly, C is not 5, or at least not in every case.

but there is a potential.

- But that's where you run into a problem because there's no way to directly measure the phase of a particle's wave function.

But when the solenoid is turned on, well, there is still no magnetic field because it's confined entirely within the coil, but there is a magnetic potential.

But below the solenoid, it points in the same direction as the beam.

But then two outsider physicists came along and defied that interpretation.

But some physicists supported Aharonov and Bohm.

But critics were unconvinced.

But the rest, well, it depends on whether the Aharonov-Bohm effect is real or not.

But if it is real, then the electrons that traveled through the center would've experienced a different potential, which would've shifted their pattern by half a phase.

but something about the potential bothers me.

But here, it will point in that direction.

But because that path is the exact same when we go this way, which is subtracted.